Quantum Development Suite

Multi-tier quantum platform for NISQ expectation primitives, fault-tolerant hardware scaling, mathematical transparency, and OpenQASM extensibility.

Circuit Primitives & Options
Expectation Value & Noise Results
Expectation ($\langle H \rangle$)
-0.7842
Calculated via Estimator Primitive
Circuit Fidelity
74.2%
Estimated mitigated outcome

This module acts as a runtime primitive evaluator for near-term intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, calculating expectation values and deploying local noise mitigation wrappers.

Algorithm & Hardware Parameters
Scalability & Coherence Projections
✓ Algorithm is theoretically executable within coherence limits.
Physical Qubits
--
-- physical per logical
Code Distance (d)
--
Surface Code
Execution Time
--
-- avg gate speed
Coherence Limit (T1)
--
Hardware decoherence boundary
Physical Qubit Allocation Breakdown --
Data: --
Syndrome: --
MSD Factories: --
Coherence Time Ratio ($t_{\text{exec}} / T_1$) 0%
Hardware Architecture Baseline Specs
2-Qubit Gate Speed --
Physical Error Rate (p) --
Coherence Time (T1) --
Fault-Tolerance Threshold (p_th) 1.0%
Cross-Hardware Architecture Comparison

Real-time resource estimation and coherence feasibility metrics evaluated across all built-in hardware backends for the current benchmark parameters.

Hardware Architecture Physical Qubits Code Dist. (d) Execution Time Coherence Ratio Status
Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) Explorer
Subroutine Scaling Output
Ancilla Qubits
16
Phase register size ($m$)
Controlled-U Operations
65,535
Total sub-circuit depth

Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) serves as a foundational subroutine for eigenvalue determination, quantum chemistry energy evaluations, and Shor's factoring loop.

Mathematical Transparency & Formula Inspector

Quantum professionals require rigorous verification. Below are the exact algebraic formulas, scaling derivations, and method disclosures embedded in the estimator engine.

1. Fault-Tolerant Logical Error Rate ($p_{\text{logical}}$)

$$p_{\text{logical}} \approx 0.03 \times \left(\frac{p}{p_{\text{th}}}\right)^{\frac{d+1}{2}}$$

Where $p$ is the physical gate error rate, $p_{\text{th}}$ is the hardware fault-tolerance threshold, and $d$ is the odd code distance. The code distance $d$ is dynamically solved to satisfy the target success probability across total circuit gate operations.

2. Physical Qubit Overhead per Logical Qubit

$$N_{\text{physical/logical}} = 2 \cdot d^2 \cdot \eta_{\text{qLDPC}} \cdot \mu_{\text{MSD}}$$

For standard 2D rotated surface codes, $\eta_{\text{qLDPC}} = 1.0$, yielding $2d^2$ qubits per data/syndrome block. High-rate qLDPC bivariate bicycle codes achieve $\eta_{\text{qLDPC}} \approx 0.15$. $\mu_{\text{MSD}}$ represents the magic state distillation factory multiplier ($1.0\times$ to $5.0\times$).

3. Coherence Feasibility Boundary

$$t_{\text{exec}} = D \cdot \left( t_{\text{gate}} \cdot N_{\text{cycle}} + t_{\text{interconnect}} \right) < T_1$$

The total circuit execution time $t_{\text{exec}}$ must remain strictly bounded below the hardware relaxation time $T_1$ for uncorrected circuits, or maintained via syndrome extraction cycles in fault-tolerant architectures.

4. Estimation Methodology: Analytical Scaling vs. Monte Carlo

This tool relies on deterministic analytical scaling models rather than stochastic Monte Carlo sampling. This architecture enables instantaneous, real-time performance feedback as sliders are adjusted. For microscopic validation, statistical error sampling, and decoding failure rate profiling, users can export configurations to specialized simulation frameworks like stim and pymatching via Tab 5.

OpenQASM 3.0 Parser & Editor
Parsed Circuit & Custom Decoder Diagnostics
Parsed Qubits
5
From `qubit[N]` declaration
Estimated Depth ($D$)
1,024
Parsed gate operations

Parsing OpenQASM automatically feeds gate counts and logical register sizing directly into the Fault-Tolerant Estimator engine.

Link copied to clipboard!